8.1 E&E policy – priority actions
BT updated that last year, BT and TK worked on merging seven E&E-related policies, consolidating them into one coherent SUSU E&E policy ( http://blogs.susu.org/policy/2014/05/21/ethics-and-environment-policy/ ). BT requested the Zone Committee's steer on where to focus for action within SUSU's E&E policy, noting that this policy is about driving SUSU to become more ethical.
LB stated that to choose the main areas to focus on for action within SUSU, a plan is needed (for development following this discussion) which says where SUSU is currently, and where SUSU wants to get to. It also needs to be considered what limits there are on what can be done; what SUSU can do directly, and what would require lobbying of the University to do - plus whether to start with big action areas, or something smaller to build then on.
BT noted that the seven key objectives in this policy link up with E&E Co-ordinator roles, and therefore filter out the action areas that are too large and focus on areas that the E&E committee can work effectively on. LB noted that Awareness and Action (objective 7) already takes place, within E&E committee's work, and therefore does not need to be included in the priority actions.
Regarding Purchasing of Good and Services (objective 5), BT stated that Corporate Critic (an online product which rates the Corporate Social Responsibility records of companies - http://www.corporatecritic.org/ ) is being used by SUSU's Commercial Development team to assess the ethics and environmental responsibility of current and new suppliers, so that is a significant part of working towards this objective. The Corporate Critic students survey conducted over the 2013 Christmas period, was used to rank priorities for the Corporate Critic categories adopted by SUSU ( https://www.susu.org/representation/minutes/931 )
In terms of further working on this area, BT stated that a good starting point would be the ethical sourcing of Student Leader hoodies, and then rolling out for other major SUSU hoodie purchases. This requires identifying who buys hoodies across the organisation, and then seeing if this sourcing and buying can be co-ordinated - first talking with the SUSU Marketing team as many of the orders are made by them (action).
TK noted that SUSU has signed up to the Procurement Flexible Framework (a sustainable procurement self assessment mechanism widely used by public bodies) and is working to Level 3. However, it is not clear who agreed to this, so this requires following up to clarify (action).
EC identified the additional area of Waste Management, objective 1 - particularly points 1.2 and 1.3 - as both residents and students have been communicating with EC regarding the need for reducing waste produced, and increasing recycling and re-use. EC suggested she could work more on this area, together with local residents, students, charities, etc., and this could be a timely activity at the end of the academic year, to coincide with students leaving their accommodation in the summer.
Other suggested ideas to consider, were enhancing wildlife and green areas on-site, and planting more areas of wild plants and flowers. BT will take these ideas on areas to start looking at, for discussion with the Chief Exec (action). LB will start drafting out plans of what work E&E could cover (action).
8.2 Union plan – focus area
BT explained that the new Union plan for 2015-20 is being drafted, and was discussed at October's Union Council meeting ( https://www.susu.org/downloads/democracy/papers/9_972_1413394179.pdf ). The next stage is for Zone committees to discuss what strategic focus areas are required, refining the current list of 17 suggested areas/words, to around 5-9, for which the Zones will flesh out what will be done in these areas. Sustainability is currently in the list of focus areas, and no longer listed in SUSU's values.
In terms of Sustainability Zone discussing the focus area(s), BT explained this could for example, involve having Sustainability as a focus area, to include equality, ethics and environment (currently these are not listed). BT suggested discussing whether it is better to include 'sustainability' as an all-encompassing word, or whether it needs to have more specific and actionable focus areas. SB noted that the current Union Plan is specific, the new Plan will be more open - an important consideration for this new five year plan is that people will lose the meaning if not specific, and it will become difficult to interpret. TK also noted to look ahead – to consider in five years' time what would we like to be? Then look at whether this currently is or is not happening. BT sees the Union Plan as the way to get students more engaged in what SUSU is doing - or it could be about change in/for the organisation - so there are two different ways this plan could be used.
It was noted that as trustees, the focus is on the organisation - as student leaders, the focus is on student engagement, getting students to be more sustainable.
There were questions regarding what part the Zone is playing in the process, of feedback for the Union Plan, and BT will check on this with DMW so that the Zone will be ready on deciding and providing feedback (action).