Ethically Divisive Adverts
Frazer let the Committee know that he had submitted an idea to Union Council about ethically divisive adverts and wanted to discuss it with the Committee first. This was prompted by an advert for a fertility clinic that Frazer felt dealt with an ethical issue in a way that other adverts don’t and raised the question of whether there should be some kind of process for approving adverts.
The Committee discussed the issue of where to draw the line between what is acceptable and what isn’t. Amy asked whether anyone had complained – Frazer said that he had spoken to Ben Franklin and there had been a few complaints.
Amy said the things that SUSU wouldn’t advertise, such as tobacco and alcohol are in line with SUSU’s message, but by making rules about what is allowed suggests that SUSU has a stance on the issues.
Sam said that the discussion wasn’t necessarily about the particular fertility clinic advert, but rather about the process of approval and there had been issues in the past with a church that regularly advertises.
The Committee discussed whether other adverts promoted unhealthy lifestyle or could be seen as pressuring students to make difficult decisions, and ultimately it was agreed that a discussion at Union Council would be useful.